Before we discuss any exponent rules, letβs remind ourselves about exponent fundamentals. When working with expressions with exponents, we have the following vocabulary:
For example, when we calculate \(8^{2} = 64\text{,}\) the base is \(8\text{,}\) the exponent is \(2\text{,}\) and the expression \(8^{2}\) is called the 2nd power of \(8\text{.}\)
Exponents indicate repeated multiplication. When the exponent is a positive integer, the power can be rewritten as repeated multiplication of the base. For example, the \(4\)th power of \(3\) can be written as \(4\) factors of \(3\) like so:
If we then count how many \(3\)s are being multiplied together, we find we have \(5+2=7\text{,}\) a total of seven \(3\)s. So \(3^5\cdot 3^2\) simplifies like this:
This demonstrates our first exponent rule, the Product Rule: when multiplying two expressions that have the same base, we can simplify the product by adding the exponents.
How can we simplify that term \(x\cdot x^3\text{?}\) Itβs really the same as \(x^1\cdot x^3\text{,}\) so according to the Product Rule, it is \(x^4\text{.}\) So we have:
If we again count how many \(3\)s are being multiplied, we have a total of two groups each with five \(3\)s. So weβd have \(2\cdot 5=10\) instances of a \(3\text{.}\) So \(\left(3^5\right)^2\) simplifies like this:
This demonstrates our second exponent rule, the Power to a Power Rule: when a base is raised to an exponent and that expression is raised to another exponent, we multiply the exponents.
The third exponent rule deals with having multiplication inside a set of parentheses and an exponent outside the parentheses. If we write out \(\left(3t\right)^5\) without using an exponent, weβd have \(3t\) multiplied by itself five times:
Keeping in mind that there is multiplication between every \(3\) and \(t\text{,}\) and multiplication between all of the parentheses pairs, we can reorder and regroup the factors:
We could leave it written this way if \(3^5\) feels especially large. But if you are able to evaluate \(3^5=243\text{,}\) then perhaps a better final version of this expression is \(243t^5\text{.}\)
We essentially applied the outer exponent to each factor inside the parentheses. It is important to see how the exponent \(5\) applied to both the \(3\)and the \(t\text{,}\) not just to the \(t\text{.}\)
This demonstrates our third exponent rule, the Product to a Power Rule: when a product is raised to an exponent, we can apply the exponent to each factor in the product.
Many examples will make use of more than one exponent rule. In deciding which exponent rule to work with first, itβs important to remember that the order of operations still applies.
Since we cannot simplify anything inside the parentheses, weβll begin simplifying this expression using the Product to a Power Rule. Weβll apply the outer exponent of 4 to each factor inside the parentheses. Then weβll use the Power to a Power Rule to finish the simplification process.
According to the order of operations, we should first simplify any exponents before carrying out any multiplication. Therefore, weβll begin simplifying this by applying the Power to a Power Rule and then finish using the Product Rule.
The order of operations say that operations inside parentheses should get the highest priority. But with \((5x)^3\text{,}\) you cannot actually do anything with the \(5\) and the \(x\text{.}\) Which exponent rule allows you to sidestep the order of operations and still simplify this expression a little?
Use the properties of exponents together with the distributive property to write the expression in a new simplified way where there are no grouping symbols.
Simplify each expression, taking note of the different behavior when adding versus multiplying. If itβs not possible to simplify an expression more than it already is, then the answer should just be the same given expression.
PTX:ERROR: WeBWorK problem Palladium_Algebra/4_1_4_63.pg with seed 1771 is either empty or failed to compile Use -a to halt with full PG and returned content
PTX:ERROR: WeBWorK problem Palladium_Algebra/4_1_4_64.pg with seed 1772 is either empty or failed to compile Use -a to halt with full PG and returned content
There are about \(10^{19}\) grains of sand on Earth. On average there are also about \(10^{19}\) atoms in a grain of sand. Using these numbers, how many total atoms are there on Earth in grains of sand?
There are roughly \(10^8\) stars in an average galaxy, and there are roughly \(10^{12}\) galaxies in the observable universe. Using these numbers, how many stars are there in the observable universe? Answer using a simplified exponent expression, not the actual result.
Fill in the blanks with algebraic expressions that make the equation true. You may not use \(0\) or \(1\) in any of the blank spaces. For example, if \(\mathord{?}+\mathord{?}=8x\text{,}\) then one possible answer is \(3x+5x=8x\text{.}\)
There are infinitely many correct answers. Be creative. After finding a correct answer, see if you can come up with a different answer that is also correct.